Theodore Langworthy, Jr. - Page 23

                                       - 23 -                                         
          each year in issue and that each such underpayment was due to               
          fraud.                                                                      
               C.   Conclusion                                                        
               Having found fraud for each year in issue, we conclude that:           
          (1) Section 6501(a) does not operate to bar the assessment and              
          collection of taxes for 1987, 1988, and 1990; (2) for 1987,                 
          petitioner is liable for the 75-percent fraud addition to tax               
          under section 6653(b)(1)(A) and for the additional amount added             
          to the tax under section 6653(b)(1)(B); (3) for 1988, petitioner            
          is liable for the 75-percent fraud addition to tax under section            
          6653(b); and (4) for 1989 and 1990, petitioner is liable for the            
          75-percent fraud penalty under section 6663.                                
               We have considered the parties' remaining arguments as to              
          fraud and conclude that the arguments are either without merit or           
          unnecessary to reach in light of our holdings above.                        
          II.  Amount of the Deficiency20                                             
               A.   Unreported Gross Receipts                                         
               Although petitioner conceded unreported gross receipts,                
          petitioner did not concede unreported gross receipts in the                 
          amounts determined by respondent.  Petitioner contends that                 
          respondent's reconstruction of gross receipts is overstated                 


          20   On brief, both parties make extensive arguments concerning             
          who bears the burden of proof with respect to the amount of the             
          deficiency.  We need not decide the situs of the burden of proof,           
          however, because the record in the instant case is sufficient for           
          us to reach our findings of fact without resort to the burden of            
          proof.                                                                      



Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011