Eugene D. Lanier, Inc. - Page 23

                                       - 23 -                                         
          No. 6, he reduced the rental rate from $7.02 to $6.24 per square            
          foot.  For Lease Comparable No. 7, he lowered the rental rate               
          from $6.63 to $5.62 per square foot.  Lambert changed a zero                
          percent adjustment for Improved Sale No. 2 to negative 10 percent           
          to reflect market conditions.  For Lease Comparable No. 4, he               
          changed the $5.24 rental figure to $3.28 per square foot.                   
          Lambert deleted Lease Comparable No. 9 entirely from his report             
          at trial.                                                                   
               Despite the numerous changes to his data, affecting each of            
          the approaches Lambert used to determine value, Lambert                     
          incongruously refused to alter his final estimated FMV for the              
          Property.  Under the circumstances, we think this is                        
          inappropriate.                                                              
               B.  Petitioners' Experts                                               
               Petitioners rely upon the reports and testimony of two                 
          certified general real property appraisers, George Parker                   
          (Parker) and Rodolfo J. Aguilar (Aguilar), both of whom the                 
          parties stipulated are experts.  (Prior to trial, respondent                
          filed a motion in limine requesting that the Court not admit into           
          evidence appraisal reports prepared by Monies dated February 16,            
          1987, and December 1, 1987, as Monies died before trial and                 
          therefore could not be cross-examined by respondent as to the               
          factors Monies considered in his valuation of the Property.  The            
          Court granted respondent's motion on March 13, 1995.)                       






Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011