Albert Lemishow - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          owed on an amount arrived at by excluding the disclosed item and            
          adding to the reported income those items to which the addition             
          to tax would apply.  The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit             
          applied the test outlined in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural               
          Resources Defense Council, Inc., supra, found section                       
          6661(b)(2)(B) ambiguous as to how to compute the portion of the             
          understatement which is attributable to disclosed items, and                
          upheld the regulation as a reasonable construction of section               
          6661.                                                                       
               We are satisfied that the ordering principles in section               
          1.6664-3, Income Tax Regs., are a reasonable interpretation of              
          how to compute the portion of the underpayment which is                     
          attributable to negligence.                                                 
                                             Decision will be entered in              
                                        accordance with respondent's Rule             
                                        155 computation.                              



















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011