Richard L. Matz and Linda A. Matz, Deceased, Richard Lee Matz, Jr., Independent Executor - Page 2

                                                - 2 -                                                   

                  All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in                            
            effect for the taxable years in issue, and all Rule references                              
            are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless                                
            otherwise indicated.  References to petitioner are to Richard L.                            
            Matz.                                                                                       
                  After concessions,1 the issues for decision are:  (1)                                 
            Whether for 1985 a $325,000 loss petitioners sustained relating                             
            to Southern Express, a failed startup airline, is ordinary or                               
            capital.  This turns on whether petitioner was engaged in a trade                           
            or business.  We hold petitioner was not engaged in a trade or                              
            business, and that the loss is a capital loss.  (2) Whether for                             
            1986 a $703,659 loss petitioners sustained relating to the                                  
            Bridgepoint project (Bridgepoint) is ordinary or capital, and                               
            whether petitioners' interest expense incurred in 1986 in the                               
            amount of $285,142 relating to Bridgepoint is investment                                    
            interest.  This turns on whether petitioner was engaged in a                                
            trade or business.  We hold petitioner was not engaged in a trade                           
            or business, that the loss is a capital loss, and that the                                  
            interest is investment interest.  (3) Whether for 1987 losses                               
            petitioners sustained relating to parcels of real property known                            


                  1     Both parties made concessions subsequent to the                                 
            issuance of the notice of deficiency.  We note that petitioners                             
            argue on brief that their alternative minimum tax net operating                             
            loss carryback from 1987 to 1984, 1985, and 1986 should be                                  
            increased by passive activity losses.  Respondent conceded this                             
            before trial.                                                                               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011