Richard L. Matz and Linda A. Matz, Deceased, Richard Lee Matz, Jr., Independent Executor - Page 15

                                                - 15 -                                                  

            examining several of petitioners' returns, however, which were                              
            admitted in evidence, we find that many of the parcels of real                              
            property which petitioners owned were reported as capital gains                             
            upon their disposition.  Therefore, although petitioners have                               
            bought and sold various parcels of real property over the years,                            
            many parcels were treated as investment properties.  Furthermore,                           
            petitioner was involved in an investment called the MMJ Ventures,                           
            which also held certain properties for investment.  This does not                           
            support the proposition that petitioners were engaged in a trade                            
            or business.  Cf. Legg v. Commissioner, 57 T.C. 164, 169 (1971),                            
            affd. per curiam 496 F.2d 1179 (9th Cir. 1974).                                             
                  Petitioners rely on Morley v. Commissioner, supra, where the                          
            Court held that a single transaction for the sale of a piece of                             
            real property qualified as a trade or business.  See also S & H,                            
            Inc. v. Commissioner, supra.  The Court stated that in certain                              
            situations this rationale may apply if "at the time the property                            
            was acquired by the taxpayer, he intended promptly to resell the                            
            property and the objective facts show that he proceeded to                                  
            attempt to implement that intent--in short, that the taxpayer's                             
            purpose was bona fide."  Morley v. Commissioner, supra at 1211.                             
                  Petitioner testified that the real estate market in the                               
            Austin, Texas, area during the early 1980s was very active and                              
            that "'investors' * * * plus the local types, were all looking                              
            for land that could be a quick profit or a quick development".                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011