- 14 - taxable income in the years received." Beaver v. Commissioner, supra at 91. Petitioner has failed to prove that the $30,000 was a loan. Petitioner has provided us with little evidence to support his claim that the $30,000 was a loan. We are not persuaded by Mr. Bentley’s testimony that he prepared a Form 1099, Miscellaneous Income, showing zero miscellaneous income paid by Radiology Affiliates, to correct “the 1099 which was * * * erroneously submitted by the employer contemporaneously with the transaction”. Petitioner has failed to produce any loan documents or testimony of his own or of anyone from Radiology Affiliates to substantiate his claim of a loan. This failure to produce such evidence leads to the inference that either such evidence does not exist or would be negative to petitioner. Wichita Terminal Elevator Co. v. Commissioner, 6 T.C. 1158, 1165 (1946) ("the failure of a party to introduce evidence within his possession and which, if true, would be favorable to him, gives rise to the presumption that if produced it would be unfavorable"), affd. 162 F.2d 513 (10th Cir. 1947). Petitioner has not given us any reason to believe that the $30,000 was a loan, and thus, we find that the $30,000 payment was an item of gross income for 1993. Respondent’s determination of a deficiency is sustained to the extent respondent included the $30,000 payment as gross income.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011