Mel T. Nelson - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         

               income operates, for purposes of subchapter S, at the                  
               corporate level.                                                       
                    1. Held: In deciding whether petitioner may                       
               increase his basis in the corporate stock, sec.                        
               108(d)(7)(A), I.R.C., applies.                                         
                    2. Held, further, sec. 108(d)(7)(A), I.R.C.,                      
               precludes the application of the conduit rules of                      
               subchapter S.                                                          
                    3. Held, further, petitioner may not increase his                 
               basis in M stock to reflect discharge of indebtedness                  
               income realized by M.                                                  

               Neil M. Goff, for petitioner.                                          
               Virginia L. Hamilton, for respondent.                                  

               HAMBLEN, Judge:  Respondent determined a deficiency of                 
          $69,381 in petitioner's 1991 Federal income tax.  After                     
          concessions, the principal issue for decision is whether                    
          discharge of indebtedness income realized and excluded from gross           
          income under section 108(a)1 passes through to shareholders of a            
          subchapter S corporation as an item of income in accordance with            
          section 1366(a)(1)(A) and, in turn, increases the basis of the              
          corporate stock under section 1367.2                                        

               1All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in            
          effect for the years at issue, and all Rule references are to the           
          Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless otherwise                 
          indicated.                                                                  
               2Petitioner conceded (1) respondent's reduction of a long-             
          term capital loss from a Metro Auto-Pico transaction by $10,000,            
          and (2) respondent's reduction of allowable passive losses from             
          Western United Service Corp., and Arapahoe Service Corp., by                
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011