- 22 -                                         
          e.g., Fifth Ave.-Fourteenth St. Corp. v. Commissioner, 147 F.2d             
          453, 457 (2d Cir. 1945); Dallas Transfer & Terminal Warehouse Co.           
          v. Commissioner, 70 F.2d 95, 96 (5th Cir. 1934); Mertens, Law of            
          Federal Income Taxation, sec. 11.42 (rev. 1990).  Section 108               
          codified the judicially created insolvency exception as an                  
          exclusion.  Merkel v. Commissioner, 109 T.C. _____ (1997); Estate           
          of Delman v. Commissioner, 73 T.C. 15, 32 (1979).  Section 108              
          was enacted by the Bankruptcy Tax Act of 1980, Pub. L. 96-589,              
          sec. 2, 94 Stat. 3389-3394; see also S. Rept. 96-1035, supra at             
          10, 1980-2 C.B. at 624.  Section 108 was "intended to accommodate           
          both bankruptcy policy and tax policy."  S. Rept. 96-1035, supra            
          at 10, 1980-2 C.B. at 624.  The legislative history illustrates             
          that Congress did not want an insolvent or bankrupt debtor to be            
          "burdened with an immediate tax liability".  Id. at 10, 1980-2              
          C.B. at 624.  Also, Congress devised the statute to defer, and              
          eventually collect within a reasonable period, "tax on, ordinary            
          income realized from debt discharge."  S. Rept. 96-1035, supra at           
          10, 1980-2 C.B. at 625.  Thus, in effect, Congress established              
          the tax-deferral mechanism in section 108 so that the prospect of           
          immediate tax liability would not deter businesses from taking              
          advantage of opportunities to repurchase or liquidate their debts           
          at less than face value.  H. Rept. 855, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 5             
          (1939), 1939-2 C.B. 504, 507; S. Rept. 1631, 77th Cong. 2d Sess.            
          77-78 (1942), 1942-2 C.B. 504, 564.  United States v. Centennial            
Page:  Previous   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   NextLast modified: May 25, 2011