Norwest Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 88

                                       - 62 -                                         

          requirements of Rev. Proc. 69-21 are satisfied.  Rev. Proc. 69-21,          
          1969-2 C.B. at 303,  states that "The costs of developing software          
          * * * in many respects so closely resemble the kind of research and         
          experimental expenditures that fall within the purview of section           
          174 * * * as to warrant accounting treatment similar to that                
          accorded such costs under that section."37  Respondent notes that           
          his concession of the section 174 test "does not mean, however,             



               37   The 1983 proposed regulations under sec. 174 provided             
          extensive language and examples relating to the treatment of the            
          development of computer software.  The proposed regulations                 
          provided that the term "research or experimental expenditures"              
          included the costs for developing "new or significantly improved            
          computer software.  The term does not include costs paid or                 
          incurred for the development of software the operational                    
          feasibility of which is not seriously in doubt."  Sec. 1.174-               
          2(a)(3), Proposed Income Tax Regs., 48 Fed. Reg. 2799 (Jan. 21,             
          1983).  This language appears to have been derived from the House           
          report accompanying ERTA, which discussed the treatment of                  
          computer software development under the R&E credit (under then              
          sec. 44F).  H. Rept. 97-201, at 114 (1981), 1981-2 C.B. 352, 360.           
               The treatment of computer software in the 1983 proposed                
          regulations was criticized by commentators because the proposed             
          regulations treated computer software differently than other                
          products, imposing a more difficult test.  54 Fed. Reg. 21225               
          (May 17, 1989).  The 1989 proposed regulations removed the                  
          controversial language and stated that computer software was to             
          be treated the same as other products.  Id. at 21227.                       
               Although Notice 87-12, 1987-1 C.B. 432, indicated that the             
          IRS intended to issue regulations further explaining the                    
          treatment of computer software under sec. 174, no regulations               
          were forthcoming.  The 1993 proposed regulations only indicated             
          that no additional conditions were to be imposed on computer                
          software development activities, and that taxpayers could                   
          continue to rely upon Rev. Proc. 69-21, 1969-2 C.B. 303.  The               
          1994 final regulations are silent altogether.  Sec. 1.174-2,                
          Proposed Income Tax Regs., 58 Fed. Reg. 15821 (Mar. 24, 1993).              





Page:  Previous  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011