Norwest Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 95

                                       - 69 -                                         

          or both of which allows the taxpayer "to make known or visible" or          
          "to obtain sight or knowledge for the first time", the definition           
          of discovery discussed above.  Congress' goals of stimulating a             
          higher rate of capital formation and improving the U.S. economy             
          cannot be achieved unless the taxpayer goes beyond the preexisting          
          knowledge of the principles of the hard sciences.  Expanding or             
          refining those principles are two, but not the exclusive, ways of           
          satisfying these goals.38                                                   
               C.  The Business Component Test                                        
               The business component test (which is actually part of the             
          discovery test) requires that the research be undertaken for the            
          purpose of discovering information the application of which is              
          intended to be useful in the development of a new or improved               
          business component of the taxpayer.  This test was addressed by             
          Congress as follows:                                                        
                    Under the conference agreement, research is treated               
               as conducted for a functional purpose only if it relates               
               to a new or improved function, performance, reliability,               
               or quality.  (Activities undertaken to assure achievement              
               of the intended function, performance, etc. of the                     
               business component after the beginning of commercial                   
               production of the component do not constitute qualified                

               38   Respondent relies on the language in TSR, Inc. & Sub.             
          v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. 903 (1991), in which we stated that the            
          technological-in-nature requirement amounted to a requirement of            
          a "technological breakthrough".  Id. at 920.  Inasmuch as TSR,              
          Inc. did not involve the R&E credit as it exists under sec. 41,             
          we do not consider that language an element of the discovery                
          test.                                                                       





Page:  Previous  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011