- 2 - In the alternative to the fraud penalties, respondent asserts in the answer to the petition that petitioners are liable for the accuracy-related penalties for 1991 and 1992 pursuant to section 6662(a). Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. After concessions,1 the issues to be decided are as follows: (1) Whether petitioner Ramon Ortiz had substantial amounts of unreported self-employment income for 1991 and 1992 from his wholesale used car business; (2) whether petitioners received additional interest income for 1991 and 1992 in the respective amounts of $3,500 and $3,000; (3) whether petitioners are entitled to a capital loss in 1991 in the amount of $3,000; (4) whether petitioner Ramon Ortiz is liable for additional self-employment taxes for 1991 and 1992; (5) whether petitioner Irma Ortiz is liable for fraud penalties under section 6663 for 1991 and 1992; and 1 Petitioners concede that they received interest of $18,000 in 1991 and $4,000 in 1992 which was not reported on their Federal income tax returns. Respondent concedes that $25,000 of petitioners' unreported income for 1992 is not subject to self-employment tax. These concessions, along with two computational adjustments for 1992 relating to a reduction in itemized deductions and the recapture of a claimed earned income credit, can be given effect in the Rule 155 computations.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011