- 37 -                                       
          Sec. 1362(a)(2); Wilson v. Commissioner, 560 F.2d 687, 689 (5th Cir.        
          1977), affg. T.C. Memo. 1975-92.                                            
               Also, if an S election is to be effective for the current year         
          in which the election is made, section 1362(b)(2)(B) provides that          
          each person who was a shareholder at any time during the year (before       
          the time the election is made) is required to consent to the                
          election.  Sec. 1362(b)(2)(B); sec. 18.1362-2(b), Temporary Income          
          Tax Regs., 48 Fed. Reg. 3591 (Jan. 26, 1983).                               
               We note that during at least part of 1988, petitioner and TABC         
          treated Helmle as an owner of the stock of 2618 Inc.  Until September       
          of 1988, TABC would not issue mixed beverage permits to the Club            
          because of Helmle's continuing ownership interest in 2618 Inc, and          
          Helmle certainly considered himself an owner of the stock of 2618           
          Inc.  In 1988, petitioner actively sought a buyer for Helmle's              
          interest in 2618 Inc.                                                       
               On the evidence, Helmle is to be considered a beneficial owner         
          of the stock of 2618 Inc during a part of 1988, and Helmle’s consent        
          therefore was necessary for the 2618 Inc's S election to be effective       
          for 1988.  See sec. 1362(b)(2)(B); Wilson v. Commissioner, supra;           
          sec. 18.1362-2(b), Temporary Income Tax Regs., supra.                       
               Respondent suggests that the duty of consistency prevents              
          petitioner from now contradicting the treatment of 2618 Inc on              
          petitioner's 1988 Federal income tax return as an S corporation.  The       
          duty of consistency is generally applicable to prevent a taxpayer           
          from taking inconsistent positions in different taxable years when          
Page:  Previous   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   NextLast modified: May 25, 2011