Jerry S. Payne - Page 42

                                         - 42 -                                       
               No evidence supports these claimed deductions, and they are            
          disallowed.                                                                 

                  Additional Deductions Claimed on Brief -- 1987 & 1988               
               On posttrial brief only, petitioner claims additional business         
          and itemized expenses for 1987 and 1988 of $110,835 and $185,219,           
          respectively (see supra p. 22).  These claimed additional expenses          
          relate to completely unsubstantiated alleged depreciation, bad debts,       
          payments to TABC, a net operating loss, medical expenses, and               
          charitable contributions.  These claimed deductions were not properly       
          raised by petitioner in his petition or by motion.  Rule 41.  No            
          credible evidence supports these claimed deductions, and they are           
          disallowed.                                                                 
               We also note that for fraud purposes, a taxpayer is generally          
          required to present probative evidence of deductions not previously         
          claimed on his income tax return before respondent bears any burden         
          of proof with regard to alleged additional deductions.  See United          
          States v. Bender, 218 F.2d 869 (7th Cir. 1955); Rivera v.                   
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1979-343.                                          
          Fraud for 1987 and 1988                                                     
               To establish fraud, respondent has the burden of proving by            
          clear and convincing evidence that a taxpayer underpaid his Federal         
          income taxes and that the taxpayer's underpayment was due to                
          fraudulent intent.  Sec. 7454(a); Rule 142(b); Clayton v.                   







Page:  Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011