Walter J. Piszczek - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         

          (9th Cir. 1981).  "A taxpayer's mere statement of intent is given           
          less weight than the objective facts of the case."  Burger v.               
          Commissioner, supra at 358.                                                 
               In deciding whether an activity is engaged in for profit, we           
          may take into account the following nonexclusive factors:                   
          (1) The manner in which the taxpayer carries on the activity;               
          (2) the expertise of the taxpayer or his or her adviser; (3) the            
          time and effort expended by the taxpayer in carrying on the                 
          activity; (4) the expectation that assets used in the activity              
          may appreciate in value; (5) the success of the taxpayer in                 
          carrying on similar or dissimilar activities; (6) the taxpayer's            
          history of income or losses in the activity; (7) the amount of              
          occasional profits, if any, that are earned; (8) the financial              
          status of the taxpayer; and (9) the elements of personal pleasure           
          or recreation.  Sec. 1.183-2(b), Income Tax Regs.  None of these            
          factors is dispositive, in and of itself, and a decision does not           
          rest on the number of factors satisfied.  Golanty v.                        
          Commissioner, supra at 426; sec. 1.183-2(b)(3), Income Tax Regs.            
               In applying these factors in the context of section 174, we            
          are mindful that the taxpayer's current activities need only be             
          aimed at enabling the taxpayer to engage in a trade or business             
          "at some time".  Green v. Commissioner, supra at 686.  With that            
          focus in mind, we will concentrate our analysis on the first five           
          factors mentioned above and on factors eight and nine.                      
               Petitioner contends he is in the trade or business of being            
          an inventor.  He argues, therefore, that the analysis of the                


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011