Katia V. and Peter Popov - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          importance of the activities performed at each business location,           
          and (2) the time spent at each place.  Id. at 175.                          
               Mrs. Popov practiced 4 to 5 hours per day in her home                  
          office.  Without practicing, she could not perform adequately and           
          risked losing employment.  Thus, practicing at home was a very              
          important component to her success as a musician.  In addition,             
          she used the home office to make demo tapes to further her                  
          career.  However, the Supreme Court stated:  “We decide, however,           
          that the point where goods and services are delivered must be               
          given great weight in determining the place where the most                  
          important functions are performed.”  Id.  In the instant case the           
          places where Mrs. Popov’s services are performed are the concert            
          halls and studios.  Her performances in these places were what              
          earned her income.  All the rest was preparatory to performing.             
          Therefore, while the home office where she prepared was an                  
          important place for her business, we cannot say that it was her             
          principal place of business.  Accordingly, she has not satisfied            
          the requirements of section 280A and is not entitled to a                   
          deduction for the use of a home office.                                     














Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011