Estate of Robert W. Quick, Deceased, Esther P. Quick, Personal Representative, and Esther P. Quick - Page 24

                                       - 24 -                                         
               Petitioners contend that section 301.6231(a)(5)-1T,                    
          Temporary Proced. & Admin. Regs., 52 Fed. Reg. 6790 (Mar. 5,                
          1987), neither mentions section 469 nor suggests that the                   
          characterization of losses as passive or nonpassive be treated as           
          an affected item.  From such silence petitioners conclude that              
          the section 469 issue involves a nonpartnership item within the             
          meaning of section 6231(a)(4), to which section 6229 does not               
          apply.  Petitioners state in this regard that "Since the                    
          partnership items adjusted by the decision [i.e., the amount of             
          losses] are irrelevant to the nature, duration, or quality of               
          petitioners' participation in the partnership's activities, the             
          [section] 469 issue cannot be an affected item under section                
          6231(a)(5)."                                                                
               Although the affected items regulations do not expressly               
          mention section 469, we do not think that the regulations are               
          meant to provide an exhaustive list of such items.  See, e.g.,              
          Jenkins v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. at 555 (holding that section              
          104(a) classification by partner of a guaranteed payment is an              
          affected item).                                                             
               Furthermore, we question petitioners' assumption in their              
          memorandum that "an item on a partner's return can be an affected           
          item if and only if the partner's treatment of that item is                 
          dependent, in the first instance, on a partnership item                     
          adjustment." (Emphasis added.)  Petitioners have cited no                   
          authority for this narrow interpretation of the scope of section            




Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011