RJR Nabisco Inc. (Formerly R.J. Reynolds Industries, Inc.) and Consolidated Subsidiaries - Page 41

                                       - 41 -                                         

          identifies the economic interests that are benefited by the                 
          litigated expenses as the various brands of cigarettes to which             
          the litigated expenses pertain.  Respondent adopts the term                 
          “brand equity” to define the economic value inherent in a                   
          successful brand.  Dr. Bajaj testified as to the major elements             
          of brand equity: (1) brand name awareness, (2) brand loyalty,               
          (3) perceived quality, and (4) brand association.  He describes             
          those elements as follows:                                                  
               Brand name awareness comes from advertising, as well as                
               from previous use or from word or mouth.  Brand loyalty                
               is primarily a result of being satisfied with the                      
               product from prior use.  Perceived quality has two main                
               elements:  (1) a user understands the product and has                  
               an opinion on its quality, [and] (2) advertising and                   
               package design can create a “personality” for the                      
               product.  For example, Mercedes cars are considered                    
               luxurious, while Volvo cars are considered safe.  * * *                
               Finally, brand associations can be about imagery                       
               created through advertising or other means.  * * *                     
          Dr. Bajaj is of the opinion that the litigated expenses “created            
          intangible assets that are inseparable from brand equity and                
          goodwill”.                                                                  
               Petitioner does not dispute that (1) advertising campaign              
          expenditures (or expenditures for graphic design) may contribute            
          to trade dress or (2) trade dress is protected by law.                      
          Petitioner points out, however, that trade dress is in fact also            
          a product of ordinary business advertising, including what                  
          respondent labels as advertising executions.  See id. (“A                   
          product’s image may be created by words, symbols, collections of            





Page:  Previous  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011