Arlan L. Rower and Sandra M. Howard - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         

          Notice of Deficiency                                                        
               On August 21, 1995, prior to the date on which petitioners             
          submitted their 1993 amended return to the IRS, respondent issued           
          a notice of deficiency (notice) to petitioners for their taxable            
          year 1993.  Respondent determined in the notice that petitioners            
          are entitled to an amount of Schedule C expenses that equals the            
          amount of gross receipts (i.e., $2,100) that petitioners reported           
          in that schedule and that they are not entitled to the balance of           
          those expenses (i.e., $21,258).  The bases for respondent's                 
          determination in the notice with respect to the expenses peti-              
          tioners claimed in their 1993 Schedule C were that (1) peti-                
          tioners have not shown that those expenses were paid or incurred            
          during 1993, (2) petitioners have not demonstrated that those               
          expenses are ordinary and necessary to petitioner's automobile              
          repair activity during that year, and (3) petitioner was not                
          engaged during 1993 in his automobile repair activity for profit.           
               Respondent further determined in the notice that petitioners           
          are not entitled to the $3,000 capital loss attributable to the             
          sale of petitioner's Ferrari that petitioners claimed in their              
          1993 Schedule D.                                                            
               In addition, respondent determined in the notice that                  
          petitioners are not entitled to the $11,371 casualty loss deduc-            
          tion that petitioners claimed in their 1993 Schedule A.                     







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011