Travis and Jayne Sanderson - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          not temporary and hold that petitioners cannot deduct                       
          unreimbursed employee expenses for the 1994 tax year.  Respondent           
          is sustained on this issue.                                                 
               2.  Overpayment                                                        
               Petitioners claim an overpayment for the 1994 tax year of              
          $20.  On the basis of the record and our findings that                      
          petitioners were not entitled to deduct unreimbursed employee               
          expenses for the 1994 tax year, we hold that petitioners are not            
          entitled to an overpayment for the 1994 tax year.                           
               3.  Accuracy-Related Penalty                                           
               Section 6662(a) imposes an accuracy-related penalty equal to           
          20 percent of the portion of any underpayment of tax that is due            
          to negligence or disregard of rules or regulations.  Under                  
          section 6662(c), negligence is any failure to make a reasonable             
          attempt to comply with the provisions of the Code and the term              
          "disregard" includes any careless, reckless, or intentional                 
          disregard.  Negligence includes the failure to exercise the due             
          care of a reasonable and ordinarily prudent person under the                
          circumstances.  Allen v. Commissioner, 925 F.2d 348, 353 (9th               
          Cir. 1991), affg. 92 T.C. 1 (1989); Neely v. Commissioner, 85               
          T.C. 934, 947 (1985).                                                       
               Petitioners' interpretation of a "home" as used in section             
          162(a)(2) was not reasonable.  Petitioner wife is a certified               
          public accountant and had previously worked for the Internal                
          Revenue Service as a revenue agent but disregarded established              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011