Martin and Barbara Schachter - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          and that were claimed on Cal Ben’s partnership tax returns.                 
          During and after trial, the parties settled all issues relating             
          to deductions disallowed in respondent’s notice of deficiency.              
               In 1993, a Federal grand jury returned an indictment                   
          charging petitioner and David Karp with tax evasion in violation            
          of section 7201 and with conspiracy to defraud the United States            
          by obstructing the lawful ascertainment and collection of income            
          taxes in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 371.                                
               On May 30, 1993, after his indictment, David Karp died.                
               On September 23, 1993, petitioner pled guilty to one count             
          of tax evasion with respect to his individual income tax                    
          liability for 1986 in violation of section 7201 and to one count            
          of conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of 18               
          U.S.C. section 371.  In connection with the above plea,                     
          petitioner was sentenced to prison and fined $250,000.                      

                                       OPINION                                        
               Under section 6653(b) the addition to tax for fraud is                 
          applicable if any part of an underpayment of tax is attributable            
          to fraud.  To establish fraud, respondent is required to prove              
          that the taxpayer underreported his or her correct tax liability            
          and that some part of the underreporting was due to fraudulent              
          intent.  DiLeo v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. 858, 873 (1991), affd.              
          959 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1992).                                                 







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011