Martin and Barbara Schachter - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
          have not maintained adequate books and records -- general survey            
          data may be rejected where taxpayers, as in the instant case,               
          seek to use such data to overcome clear evidence of unreported              
          income.  See, e.g., United States v. Marabelles, 724 F.2d 1374,             
          1381-1382 (9th Cir. 1984); Lollis v. Commissioner, 595 F.2d 1189,           
          1190-1191 (9th Cir. 1979), affg. T.C. Memo. 1976-15; Cebollero v.           
          Commissioner, 967 F.2d 986 (4th Cir. 1992), affg. T.C. Memo.                
          1990-618.  As we have stated --                                             
               Such evidence is * * * of little probative value * * *                 
               and * * * too speculative to serve as the basis for                    
               additional reductions in gross income * * * [Farrow v.                 
               Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1985-518.]                                    
               We note that once respondent has established unreported                
          sales, the taxpayer has the burden of proving with credible                 
          evidence expenses that would offset the unreported sales.  See              
          United States v. Marabelles, supra at 1379; Barragan v.                     
          Commissioner, 69 F.3d 543 (9th Cir. 1995) (citing Elwert v.                 
          United States, 231 F.2d 928, 933 (9th Cir. 1956)), affg. without            
          published opinion T.C. Memo. 1993-92; Avery v. Commissioner, T.C.           
          Memo. 1993-344.                                                             
               For the first time at trial, petitioners asserted their                
          entitlement to additional deductible business expenses for Cal              
          Ben.  The petition filed by petitioners made no allegation with             
          regard to unclaimed partnership expenses, and general and vague             
          references in the petition to “additional” facts do not satisfy             
          the affirmative pleading requirement of Rule 34(b) with regard to           





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011