Susan E. Shores - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         
          entertained.  Petitioner testified that she kept a calendar for             
          these events, and the calendar was destroyed by water damage.  On           
          the basis of this record, we conclude that petitioner is entitled           
          to a deduction in the amount of $262 for meal and entertainment             
          expenses.                                                                   
               10.  Utilities (Home Office)                                           
               Petitioner deducted utility expenses in the amount of                  
          $1,742.80.  Section 280A, in general, disallows deductions with             
          respect to the use of a dwelling unit that is used by the                   
          taxpayer during the taxable year as a residence.  However,                  
          section 280A(c) permits the deduction of expenses allocable to a            
          portion of the dwelling unit which is exclusively used on a                 
          regular basis as "the principal place of business for any trade             
          or business of the taxpayer".  Thus, to qualify under section               
          280A(c) for a home-office deduction, petitioner must establish              
          that a portion of her dwelling is (1) exclusively used, (2) on a            
          regular basis, and (3) as the principal place of business for her           
          trade or business.  Hamacher v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 348, 353              
          (1990).  However, section 280A(c)(5) limits the amount of                   
          deductions to the excess of the gross income derived from the use           
          of the home office over the deductions allocable to the home                
          office that are otherwise allowable.                                        
               The determination of the principal place of business depends           
          on the particular facts of each case.  Commissioner v. Soliman,             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011