Susan E. Shores - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
          506 U.S. 168, 175 (1993).  Two primary considerations in deciding           
          whether a taxpayer may deduct costs of a home office are:  (1)              
          The relative importance of the activities performed at each                 
          business location, and (2) the time spent at each place.  Id.               
          Other than testifying that she used a room in her home                      
          exclusively as her main business office, petitioner presented no            
          evidence to establish either the nature of or the relative                  
          importance of the activity performed at this location.  Further,            
          petitioner did not establish how much time she spent in her                 
          office.  Therefore, we conclude that petitioner is not entitled             
          to a home office deduction.                                                 
               11.  Telephone                                                         
               Petitioner also submitted copies of her telephone bills from           
          1994.  Petitioner did not maintain a separate telephone line for            
          her business.  We may estimate the deductible amount of                     
          petitioner's telephone expenses.  Laurano v. Commissioner, 69               
          T.C. 723, 727 (1978).  Section 262(b) provides that the basic               
          local telephone service for the first telephone line to a                   
          taxpayer's residence is a nondeductible, personal expense.                  
               Petitioner testified that most of her long distance calls              
          were business related.  Petitioner presented copies of her                  
          telephone bills from 1994.  In calculating her business expenses,           
          petitioner excluded amounts related to the basic local service.             
          On the basis of our best judgment, we find that petitioner is               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011