Thomas J. Spielbauer - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         

          percent of their expenses from the Professional Development Fund            
          up to $10,000 among all of the attorneys in petitioner's office.            
          Petitioner claimed $933.50 for educational expenses in 1992, of             
          which $150 was reimbursed by the county.  Therefore, it appears             
          that petitioner, if he had requested reimbursement, could have              
          been reimbursed another $616.75 ($450 + 166.75), leaving $166.75            
          as unreimbursed educational expenses.  Educational expenses are             
          considered ordinary and necessary business expenses if the                  
          education maintains or improves skills required by the taxpayer             
          in his employment, or meets the express requirements of an                  
          employer, imposed as a condition for the taxpayer's continued               
          employment, status, or rate of compensation.  Sec. 1.162-5(a),              
          Income Tax Regs.  Personal expenses are not deductible.  Sec.               
          262.                                                                        
               Petitioner's educational expenses were for various legal               
          seminars and training courses.  This is the type of education               
          designed to maintain or improve petitioner's skills as a public             
          defender.  Petitioner, therefore, is entitled to deduct his                 
          educational expenditures to the extent he could not have been               
          reimbursed--$166.75.                                                        
               The county also reimbursed public defenders for any required           
          travel.  Petitioner has failed to show that he requested                    
          reimbursement for any of his travel expenses; therefore, we                 
          sustain respondent on this issue.                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011