Thomas J. Spielbauer - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         

               Section 6651(a)(1) imposes an addition to tax for failure to           
          file a return on the date prescribed (determined with regard to             
          any extension of time for filing), unless it is shown that such             
          failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful                   
          neglect.  The taxpayer has the burden of proof to show the                  
          addition is improper.  Rule 142(a); United States v. Boyle, 469             
          U.S. 241, 245 (1985).                                                       
               Respondent has determined that petitioner's 1992 Federal               
          income tax return was due, after extension, on August 15, 1993.             
          Petitioner filed his Federal income tax return for 1992 on                  
          February 14, 1995.10  Petitioner's only argument against the                
          delinquency addition is that he felt that he had no taxes owing.            
          We have already found that petitioner did owe tax; therefore,               
          respondent is sustained on this issue.                                      
          Negligence                                                                  
               Section 6662(a) imposes a penalty in an amount equal to 20             
          percent of the portion of the underpayment of tax attributable to           
          one or more of the items set forth in section 6662(b), including            
          negligence or disregard of rules or regulations.  Respondent                
          determined that a portion of the underpayment of petitioner's tax           
          was due to negligence or intentional disregard of rules or                  

               10  Petitioner's Federal income tax return which was                   
          submitted at trial is stamped “Feb 14 1995", and this is the date           
          argued in respondent's brief.  The date used in the statutory               
          notice of deficiency, however, is Mar. 3, 1995.  This discrepancy           
          does not affect the amount of the addition to tax.                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011