Estate of Honore V. De St. Aubin, Deceased, Ovide E. De St. Aubin, Executor, et al. - Page 39

                                       - 39 -                                         

                       (2) Where a will or trust agreement                            
                  authorizes the fiduciary to satisfy wholly or                       
                  partly in kind a pecuniary disposition or                           
                  transfer in trust of a pecuniary amount and the                     
                  instrument requires the fiduciary to value the                      
                  assets selected by the fiduciary for such                           
                  distribution as of a date other than the dates                      
                  of their distribution, the assets selected by the                   
                  fiduciary for that purpose, together with any                       
                  cash distributed, shall have an aggregate value                     
                  on the dates of their distribution amounting to                     
                  no less than, and to the extent practicable no                      
                  more than, the amount of such testamentary                          
                  disposition or transfer in trust as stated in,                      
                  or determined by the formula stated in, the                         
                  instrument.  [Emphasis added.]                                      

                  The major impetus for the enactment of EPTL section                 
             2-1.9 was the need to protect unwary New York residents                  
             from Rev. Proc. 64-19, 1964-1 C.B. (Part 1) 682, which                   
             threatened to deny the marital deduction to certain                      
             estates unless the will in question or State law placed a                
             floor on the value of the assets distributed to the spouse.              
             However, EPTL section 2-1.9 also added a ceiling ("to                    
             the extent practicable") on the value of the assets                      
             distributed, a feature not required by Rev. Proc. 64-19.                 
             Implicit in this ceiling is a rejection of the fairly                    
             representative approach of In re Bush's Will.                            
                  The legislative history of EPTL section 2-1.9 supports              
             this interpretation.  Shortly before the enactment of EPTL               
             section 2-1.9, New York set up a commission to analyze its               
             existing estate law and to suggest amendments.  Writing as               





Page:  Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011