- 9 - 5. Taxes, Insurance, and Miscellaneous Expenses Petitioners claimed deductions for various expenditures for taxes and insurance. Respondent disallowed most of these deductions. With respect to the taxes paid to the State, deductions were allowed on Schedule A, except for the cost of a fishing license that was disallowed. With regard to the payment for insurance, respondent allowed a deduction for the business casualty insurance and disallowed deductions claimed for life insurance or other personal insurance. See sec. 264. Petitioners have not established that they are entitled to deductions in greater amounts than those allowed by respondent. With regard to the balance of the disputed items, we have reviewed the record and sustain respondent's determinations. Deductions were claimed for petitioners' cats and dogs on the respective grounds that they were necessary to control the mouse populations and provide security at the shop. The animals, at least for the most part, were located at the residence. Deductions were also claimed for magazines such as People, Ladies Home Journal, and Family Circle. Petitioners did not explain the business purpose for these publications. These items speak for themselves. 6. Section 6662(a) Penalty Respondent determined that petitioners are liable for an accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) for negligence. Section 6662(a) provides that "there shall be added to the tax anPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011