Jeffrey C. and Kelly O. Stone - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          amount equal to 20 percent of the portion of the underpayment to            
          which this section applies."  Section 6662 applies to "the                  
          portion of any underpayment which is attributable to", inter                
          alia, negligence or disregard of rules or regulations.  Sec.                
          6662(b)(1).  Negligence "includes any failure to make a                     
          reasonable attempt to comply with the provisions * * * [of the              
          Internal Revenue Code], and the term 'disregard' includes any               
          careless, reckless, or intentional disregard."  Sec. 6662(c).               
               Petitioners essentially contend that they were not negligent           
          because they relied on Cody & Co. to prepare their returns.  Mr.            
          Stone testified that they were prompted to use Cody & Co.                   
          because:  "We found things that we probably could be able to--to            
          deduct, you know.  I don't--wouldn't necessarily say they're                
          grey, but I think most of the CPAs * * * don't do a thorough job.           
          They're not ready to push a little bit."                                    
               In differentiating between personal and business expenses,             
          there may be some "grey" areas, but the expenditures here do not            
          fall within those areas, at least not without a Herculean effort            
          of delusion.  The claimed expenses here, as noted by the Montana            
          State Tax Appeal Board, are clearly personal living expenses of             
          petitioners.                                                                
               Moreover, while reliance on advice may provide a defense to            
          negligence, it must be shown that the person rendering the advice           
          was competent to give that advice and that the taxpayer provided            
          him with requisite information.  See Freytag v. Commissioner, 89            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011