- 11 - Ms. Surridge began breeding and racing horses during the early 1970's. Petitioners' activity never reported a profit. Exclusive of the $1,500 insurance payment, petitioners received less than $3,000 in race winnings during the subject years, while claiming total losses of $228,988. Petitioners have not established that any of these losses were due to unforeseen or fortuitous circumstances beyond their control. Furthermore, they offered no evidence at trial, other than their self-serving testimony, to support their assertions that they expected their pattern of losses to change. This factor favors respondent. 7. Amount of Occasional Profits From the Activity We consider the amount of occasional profits, if any, from the subject activity. Sec. 1.183-2(b)(7), Income Tax Regs. An occasional small profit from an activity generating large losses, or from an activity in which the taxpayer has made a large investment, would not generally be determinative that the activity is engaged in for profit. However, substantial profit, though only occasional, would generally be indicative that an activity is engaged in for profit, where the investment or losses are comparatively small. Id. Petitioners barely recouped approximately 1 percent of their expenses in the form of race winnings. Petitioners provided no evidence that they ever made a profit from putting a horse out toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011