- 6 - Revenue Agent Bacino also concluded that for the most part these individuals lacked credibility. For example, in many instances, their account of the events surrounding the alleged loans changed from one meeting to the next. In other instances, there was a failure to recall the details regarding the alleged loan transactions. In one instance, the lender could not be reached because he was located outside the country. Revenue Agent Bacino further determined that even if petitioners had borrowed such amounts, there was no persuasive evidence that the loan proceeds were paid in cash and deposited to petitioners' accounts. In concluding his investigation of the leads provided by petitioners, Revenue Agent Bacino determined that petitioners had failed to substantiate a nontaxable source of income with respect to a large portion of the deposits. His final report with respect to petitioners' individual returns reflected the following: 1991 1992 Total deposits: $217,862 $160,345 Total cash expenditures 31,435 Nontaxable items1 (68,707) Reported income (17,149) (24,282) Total adjustment 132,006 167,498 1 Includes "not sufficient funds" items and inter-account transfers. Revenue Agent Bacino did not make any adjustments to RAJ's returns.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011