- 6 - investigation and conviction of petitioner for filing a false income tax return for the tax year 1984. On November 2, 1995, respondent sent a 30-day letter to petitioner, which afforded petitioner an opportunity for an Appeals conference with respondent's Office of the Regional Director of Appeals. On December 27, 1995, respondent received petitioner's protest of respondent's determination of his 1981 income tax liability. Petitioner failed to raise a statutory period of limitations defense in his protest. In the Appeals Transmittal Memorandum and Supporting Statement, respondent's Appeals Officer stated that petitioner did not raise any tax issues relating to the period in issue, instead accusing the Internal Revenue Service and its employees of criminal acts. Respondent issued the notice of deficiency to petitioner on September 30, 1996. We must identify the point at which the United States is first considered to have taken a position, and then decide whether the position taken from that point forward was or was not substantially justified. The "substantially justified" standard is applied as of the separate dates that respondent took positions, first in the administrative proceedings and afterwards in the proceedings in this Court.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011