Estate of Emanuel Trompeter, Deceased, Robin Carol Trompeter Gonzalez and Janet Ilene Trompeter Polacheck, Co-Executors - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         

               Irene Scott Carroll, for respondent.                                   


                                SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION                                  

               LARO, Judge:  The dispute herein involves the Rule 155                 
          computation mandated by the Court's Memorandum Opinion filed as             
          Estate of Trompeter v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-35.  The               
          issue before the Court is one of first impression; namely,                  
          whether an estate's underpayment for purposes of computing the              
          fraud penalty is determined based solely on expenses which are              
          included on the Federal estate tax return, or based on all                  
          deductible expenses including deficiency interest and                       
          professional fees which arise after the filing of the return.               
               We hold that the underpayment is determined by taking into             
          account all expenses.  Unless otherwise stated, section                     
          references are to the applicable provisions of the Internal                 
          Revenue Code.  Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of                
          Practice and Procedure.  Estate references are to the Estate of             
          Emanuel Trompeter.  Mr. Trompeter (the decedent) resided in                 
          Thousand Oaks, California, when he died on March 18, 1992.  The             
          estate's coexecutors, Robin Carol Trompeter Gonzalez and Janet              
          Ilene Trompeter Polachek, resided in Florida and California,                
          respectively, when the petition was filed.                                  
               In Estate of Trompeter v. Commissioner, supra, we held that            
          the estate was subject to the fraud penalty under section                   
          6663(a).  The estate computes the amount of this penalty based on           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011