Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         
               Respondent justifies the proposed recharacterization on the            
          ground that the form adopted by the parties "does not comport               
          with economic reality".  Respondent's argument in its purest                
          terms is that sale of all the issued shares in MGM to the TBS               
          Group and MGM's sale of all the issued shares in UA to Tracinda             
          cannot be viewed as occurring simultaneously for tax purposes.              
          Respondent contends the transactions must be assigned a                     
          sequential order for tax purposes.  Respondent further argues               
          that since simultaneous sale transactions cannot be recognized              
          for tax purposes, it is necessary to recharacterize the                     
          transaction to reflect its true substance.                                  
               We find respondent's argument that the sales could not occur           
          simultaneously for tax purposes to be no more than superficially            
          appealing, unsupported by authority, and without merit in view of           
          the stipulated facts.  On brief, respondent cites no authority              
          for the proposition that "some kind of [sequential] ordering of             
          the steps of the transaction is necessary for tax purposes to               
          determine the tax consequences."  Transactions that occur                   
          simultaneously or are deemed by law to have occurred concurrently           
          or simultaneously are commonplace.13  In G.M. Trading Corp. v.              

               13The regulations speak of simultaneous events in at least             
          22 places.  For instance, sec. 1.351-1(a)(1), Income Tax Regs.,             
          provides:                                                                   

               "immediately after the exchange" does not necessarily                  
               require simultaneous exchanges by two or more persons,                 
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011