Union Carbide Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 28

                                        - 28 -                                         
          its origin, or its purpose.  See Faltesek v. Commissioner, 92                
          T.C. at 1210-1211.                                                           
               We have considered the remaining arguments of the parties               
          and, to the extent that they have not been addressed herein, find            
          them to be either not germane or unconvincing.                               
               In light of the above, we hold that the Regulation is valid             
          and, since petitioner has failed to follow its provisions, we                
          further hold that petitioner is not entitled to its claims for               
          additional FSC commission expenses, in whole or in part, for the             
          taxable years at issue.  Accordingly, respondent's cross-motion              
          is granted, and petitioner's motion is denied.                               
               To reflect the foregoing,                                               


                                              An order granting                        
                                        respondent's cross-motion for                  
                                        partial summary judgment and                   
                                        denying petitioner's motion                    
                                        for partial summary judgment will              
                                        be issued.                                     
                                                                                      












Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  

Last modified: May 25, 2011