Douglas A. and Janet Vander Heide - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         

          to various entities.  With respect to the equipment, a wrap lease           
          was executed between Hambrose as lessor and Charterhouse as                 
          lessee.  Hambrose assigned the wrap lease to the partnership when           
          the partnership purchased the equipment.  The partnership                   
          purchased the equipment subject to all liens created at each                
          stage of the transaction, including the liens of the original               
          third-party lenders, the wrap lease, and all user leases.  At the           
          end of the day, the partnership owned the computers, the                    
          operating companies used them, and Charterhouse, Hambrose, and              
          the partnership traded streams of financing payments and lease              
          payments.  The transactions are described in more detail as                 
          follows.                                                                    
               The Initial Equipment                                                  
               CIS initially purchased, subject to financing from third-              
          party lenders, certain IBM computer equipment (the initial                  
          equipment), for a total purchase price of $825,150.34.  CIS                 
          leased all of the initial equipment to Harrisburg Hospital,                 
          Danbury Hospital, and Leeds & Northrup, the actual end users of             
          the equipment.                                                              
               The Initial Equipment Purchase--Charterhouse                           
               The second purchaser3 then paid CIS $494,861--$19,794 in               
          cash and the balance represented by nonrecourse installment                 



               3  The “second purchaser” was someone other than                       
          Charterhouse.  The "second purchaser" was never identified in the           
          partnership's private offering memorandum (POM).                            


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011