- 19 - In this case, resolution of the at-risk issue is based partly on a conclusion drawn from complex and interrelated contractual documents. See Waters v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1991-462, affd. 978 F.2d 1310 (2d Cir. 1992). The facts of this case are similar to the facts of a number of other cases in which taxpayers prevailed and were found by this Court to be at risk with respect to sale-leaseback transactions. See, e.g., Levy v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 838 (1988); Gefen v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 1471 (1986); Brady v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1990-626; Emershaw v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1990-246, affd. 949 F.2d 841 (6th Cir. 1991). We have also found that many similarly situated taxpayers, who did not prevail and were found to be not at risk, nevertheless had substantial authority for positions taken on their returns. See Estate of Bradley v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-341; Waters v. Commissioner, supra; Epsten v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1991-252; Moser v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-142, affd. 914 F.2d 1040 (8th Cir. 1990); B & A Distrib. Co. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1988-589. On the facts of this case, with regard to the at-risk issue, we find that there existed substantial authority for petitioners' return position. We therefore hold that petitioners are not liable for the section 6661 additions to tax. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Last modified: May 25, 2011