Phillip Vazzana and Estate of Yvonne Vazzana, Deceased, Phllip Vazzana, Executor - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         



                Phillip Vazzana and Estate of Yvonne Vazzana, docket No. 914-96       
                                              Additions to Tax                        
          Year   Deficiency   Sec. 6653(a)   Sec. 6653(b)(1)   Sec. 6661   Sec. 6663(a)
          1988    $69,781       $1,786          $25,550        $17,445         --     
          1989    190,002          --               --             --       $14,251   
                   Joseph M. Valenza and Mildred Valenza, docket No. 915-96           
                                             Additions to Tax                         
          Year   Deficiency   Sec. 6653(a)   Sec. 6653(b)(1)   Sec. 6661   Sec. 6663(a)
          1988    $28,383         $112          $19,609         $7,096         --     
          1989     20,941          --               --             --       $15,706   
          All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect           
          for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax              
          Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.  After concessions, the              
          issues for decision are as follows:                                         
               1.  The extent to which petitioners underreported the gross            
          receipts of Valenza & Vazzana Construction Co. (V&V).  We hold              
          that they underreported such receipts by $121,289 for 1988 and              
          $101,029 for 1989.                                                          
               2.  Whether petitioners have substantiated certain V&V                 
          expenditures.  We hold that they have to the extent provided                
          below.                                                                      
               3.  Whether petitioners are each entitled to a depreciation            
          deduction relating to their rental property.  We hold that they             
          are not.                                                                    









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011