- 10 - $101,029 for 1989. This underreporting resulted from Messrs. Vazzana and Valenza cashing a substantial number of V&V customer checks, rather than depositing them into V&V's account. Messrs. Vazzana and Valenza knew that their accountants calculated V&V's gross receipts by adding the deposits in V&V's account and that the cashed checks would not be reported on V&V's income tax returns. Messrs. Vazzana and Valenza contend that they used the cash proceeds to pay for unreported V&V expenses and that the unreported receipts and expenses netted out. Respondent, however, has established that, with the exception of the cash payments to Mr. Schmitt (i.e., $7,850 in 1988 and $10,381 in 1989), Messrs. Vazzana and Valenza did not substantiate any unreported cash expenditures. Therefore, we reject their contention. Messrs. Vazzana and Valenza concede that they each failed to report gross receipts from their rental property of $32,162 for 1988 and $8,730 for 1989. They have offered no explanation for their failure to report this income. Accordingly, we hold that the portions of the deficiencies relating to V&V's gross receipts and the rental property were due to fraud and that Messrs. Vazzana and Valenza are liable for the additions to tax for fraud relating to such portions. Respondent, however, has not established that Mrs. Vazzana and Mrs. Valenza acted with fraudulent intent. As a result, Mrs.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011