- 62 -
supported by the record. Although she did allow Mr. Gherman to
use her name in order to conduct business, there is no suggestion
that Ms. Walters did so with the understanding that criminal
activities would occur. Indeed, as far as we know, during the
first 13 years of FIP's existence, no conversion of client funds
occurred.
Under the circumstances, we conclude that it would be
inequitable to hold Ms. Walters liable for the deficiencies and
additions to tax. Accordingly, we hold that Ms. Walters is
entitled to relief under section 6013(e) as an innocent spouse.
To reflect the foregoing,
Decision will be entered
under Rule 155.
Page: Previous 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 Last modified: May 25, 2011