- 62 - supported by the record. Although she did allow Mr. Gherman to use her name in order to conduct business, there is no suggestion that Ms. Walters did so with the understanding that criminal activities would occur. Indeed, as far as we know, during the first 13 years of FIP's existence, no conversion of client funds occurred. Under the circumstances, we conclude that it would be inequitable to hold Ms. Walters liable for the deficiencies and additions to tax. Accordingly, we hold that Ms. Walters is entitled to relief under section 6013(e) as an innocent spouse. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62
Last modified: May 25, 2011