- 3 - not make estimated tax payments for the taxable year.2 The sole issue for decision is whether certain discharge of indebtedness income he received in the year 1993 is not subject to tax because it is income derived from Indian fishing-rights-related activity. All of the facts of this case are contained in a Stipulation of Facts that along with an attached exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. Background Petitioner resided in Bellingham, Washington, at the time the petition was filed in this case. Petitioner was in 1993 and is still a member of the Lummi Nation (nation), a federally recognized tribe of American Indians. The Lummi Nation is a signatory of the Treaty between the United States and the Dw�mish, Suqu�mish and other allied and subordinate tribes of Indians in Washington Territory concluded on January 22, 1855, at Point Elliott, Washington Territory, 12 2Petitioner made no argument and presented no evidence to show that his failure to file was due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, nor did he argue or prove that his failure to make estimated tax payments is excused because of a statutory exception. We therefore deem these issues to be conceded by petitioner. Rule 149(b); see Rothstein v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 488, 497 (1988); Cerone v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 1, 2 n.1 (1986).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011