Richard Leo Warbus - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         

          1993,5 not from any activity by him "directly related" to                   
          harvesting, processing, transporting, or selling fish in the                
          exercise of recognized fishing rights of an Indian tribe.  We               
          note that even had petitioner's loan proceeds been income in the            
          first instance in 1984, their source was not activity directly              
          related to harvesting, processing, transporting, or selling fish            
          in the exercise of recognized fishing rights of an Indian tribe.            
          Forgiveness of the repayment of those loan proceeds by a third              
          party cannot convert the freeing of petitioner's assets into                
          fishing-rights-related income merely because the loan proceeds              
          were used to purchase equipment used in such an activity.                   
               The BIA does not engage in harvesting, processing,                     
          transporting, or selling fish and is not a "qualified Indian                
          entity" under section 7873(b)(3).  Petitioner's income was                  
          generated in the year 1993 by the BIA's discharge of his                    
          indebtedness.  Petitioner therefore did not receive directly, or            
          through a qualified Indian entity, income from a fishing-rights-            
          related activity.                                                           








               5The parties stipulated that petitioner was engaged in                 
          fishing-rights-related activity in the years 1986 through 1991.             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011