Wesley C. and Rhonda A. Wickum - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
                              Addition to Tax  Accuracy-Related Penalty               
          Year      Deficiency    Sec. 6651(a)(1)        Sec. 6662(a)                 
          1990      $7,664         $654                $1,533                         
          1992      10,807         ---                 2,161                          
          1993      10,069         ---                 2,014                          
               Unless otherwise noted, all section references are to the              
          Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all             
          Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and                  
          Procedure.                                                                  
               The deficiencies and the accuracy-related penalties result             
          from respondent’s determination that Wesley Wickum (petitioner)             
          was a common-law employee rather than an employee as defined in             
          section 3121(d)(3)(B),1 as petitioners claimed in their returns.            
          Respondent recomputed petitioners’ income taxes by subjecting               
          petitioner’s business expense deductions to the 2-percent floor             
          under section 67 and by recomputing petitioners’ alternative                
          minimum tax pursuant to sections 55(a) and 56(b)(1)(A)(i).                  
               After concessions, we must decide the following issues:                
               (1) Whether petitioner was a statutory employee.  We hold              
          that he was not.                                                            
               (2) Whether petitioner was an employee or an independent               
          contractor under the common-law standards.  We hold that he was             
          an independent contractor.2                                                 

               1 We will refer to a person who qualifies under sec.                   
          3121(d)(3)(B) as a “statutory employee”.                                    
               2 Respondent also argues that if we find that petitioner was           
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011