Wesley C. and Rhonda A. Wickum - Page 22

                                       - 22 -                                         
          section 6521, offset self-employment taxes with taxes paid                  
          erroneously under section 3101.  Lozon v. Commissioner, T.C.                
          Memo. 1997-250.                                                             
               Further, respondent asserted in his amendment to answer, and           
          argues on brief, that in the event we find that petitioner was an           
          independent contractor, petitioners must include in income                  
          contributions by Combined and pretax contributions by petitioner            
          into pension and profit-sharing plans and also insurance premiums           
          and health care costs paid by Combined.8  Petitioners offer no              
          argument on this point and instead concede on brief that they               
          must include in income contributions to pension and profit-                 
          sharing plans and payments by Combined of insurance premiums and            
          health care costs:                                                          
                    The Respondent correctly observes that if Wickum                  
               is found to be an independent contractor then there                    
               will have to be a recalculation for the relevant years,                
               in order to include in his gross income some benefits                  
               which, if he is found to be a statutory employee, would                
               not be taxed.  The amounts of the benefits involved are                
               the subject of a supplemental stipulation between the                  
               parties hereto, and are not disputed. * * *                            

          Thus, we need not, and do not, address the question of whether              
          the reclassification of a taxpayer as an independent contractor             
          requires the inclusion in income of contributions to employee               

               8 Respondent concedes that, had petitioners’ statutory                 
          employee claim prevailed, petitioners would not be required to              
          include the contributions to pension and profit-sharing plans in            
          income.                                                                     





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011