Estate of Ellie B. Williams, Deceased, Robert M. Driggers, Sr., Personal Representative, et al. - Page 26

                                        -26-                                          
          the Clay County property was worth $1,150,555 ($497 per acre) on            
          the date decedent transferred an undivided one-half interest in             
          it to petitioner.                                                           
               Elmore stated that the Seminole property sold in 1979 and              
          the Putnam County property sold in 1980 to the Thompson                     
          partnership were comparable to the Clay County property.  For the           
          reasons stated above at paragraph II-B-4-a, we believe that                 
          Elmore relied too greatly on these two sales to establish the               
          value of the Clay County property.                                          
               Elmore also used as comparable sales decedent's and                    
          petitioner's 1986 sale of 329.26 acres of the Clay County                   
          property for $911 per acre and the 1982 sale of 2,230 acres from            
          J.P. Hall & Sons, Inc., to Georgia-Pacific for $500 per acre (the           
          Hall property).                                                             
               Elmore's report states that the Hall property was primarily            
          (about 90 percent) wetlands and that Georgia-Pacific bought the             
          property for its peat deposits, which had an estimated production           
          value of $1,500 per acre.  Elmore did not consider whether the              
          Clay County property had peat deposits.  The Clay County property           
          was 35 percent wetlands.                                                    
               Respondent argues that petitioners' suggestion that Georgia-           
          Pacific paid more for the Hall property because it had peat                 
          deposits erroneously assumes that Georgia-Pacific would have no             
          production costs.  We disagree.  Elmore's report states that                






Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011