Estate of Ellie B. Williams, Deceased, Robert M. Driggers, Sr., Personal Representative, et al. - Page 31

                                        -31-                                          
                    c.   Discounts for Lack of Marketability and Lack of              
                         Control                                                      
               Petitioners' expert, Wiggins, testified that the fractional            
          interests at issue here should be discounted by 20 percent due to           
          lack of marketability and by 30 percent for lack of control and             
          the necessity of resorting to partition and related costs to                
          liquidate one's interest, for a total discount of 44 percent.  He           
          concluded that a marketability discount is appropriate because of           
          the 9-month marketing time and 10-percent real estate commission            
          cost involved in selling real property in that particular market.           
          He said that the holder of a fractional interest in real estate             
          lacks control because he or she cannot unilaterally decide how to           
          manage it.  Wiggins noted that a partition action can take a                
          considerable amount of time and expense.  He estimated that                 
          partition costs would be $164,400 for the 1980 transfer, $172,500           
          for the 1983 transfer, and $76,500 for the estate property                  
          because the properties are irregularly shaped parcels and contain           
          pineland, swampland, and riverfront acreage.  Respondent did not            
          cross-examine Wiggins or offer any evidence to rebut Wiggins'               
          testimony.  Respondent offered no evidence regarding the size of            
          the discount that should apply here.  See Hess v. Commissioner,             
          24 B.T.A. 475, 478 (1931) (Court adopted the taxpayer's                     










Page:  Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011