Robert Leonard Barnett - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         

               Respondent's motion for summary judgment will be denied in             
          part, insofar as petitioner will be given the opportunity to                
          amend his petition to plead and at a trial to prove the facts               
          that bear on his belated assertions of entitlement to itemized              
          deductions and of reasonable cause for failure to file returns.             
          1.   Petitioner's Constitutional Argument                                   
               Article I, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution states in                
          relevant part:                                                              
                    Representatives and direct Taxes shall be                         
               apportioned among the several States which may be                      
               included within this Union, according to their                         
               respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding                
               to the whole Number of free Persons, including those                   
               bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding                    
               Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other                           
               Persons.[1]                                                            
               It is well settled that the phrase "excluding Indians not              
          taxed" is simply part of an apportionment provision designed to             
          determine the number of representatives for each State and to               
          correctly apportion the direct taxes among the States.  In                  
          apportioning the representatives and direct taxes among the                 
          States, "Indians not taxed" were excluded from the count.  United           
          States v. Kagama, 118 U.S. 375, 378 (1886).  Although, at the               
          time the Constitution was adopted, some Indians were taxed, while           


               1 Amended in respects not germane to this inquiry by sec. 2            
          of the Fourteenth Amendment with respect to the mode of                     
          apportionment of representatives among the several States and by            
          the Sixteenth Amendment with respect to taxes on income without             
          apportionment.                                                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011