Robert Leonard Barnett - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         

          another ground T.C. Memo. 1992-404; Sylvester v. Commissioner,              
          T.C. Memo. 1999-35; United States v. Brown, supra at 128.                   
          Petitioner has not relied on any statute or treaty that entitles            
          him to exemption from Federal taxation by reason of his                     
          membership in any Indian nation or tribe--if any such there be--            
          whose members enjoy such exemption.  Petitioner neither                     
          identified the Indian nation or tribe in which he claims                    
          membership nor brought to our attention any statute or treaty               
          that grants any such exemption from the Federal income tax laws             
          for interest and income derived from employment as an employee or           
          independent contractor.  Consequently, petitioner is not exempt             
          from the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, and the amounts           
          determined by respondent, which petitioner does not otherwise               
          contest, are included in his gross income for Federal income tax            
          purposes.                                                                   
               As the Court of Appeals said in LaFontaine v. Commissioner,            
          533 F.2d 382, 382 (8th Cir. 1976), affg. per curiam T.C. Memo.              
          1975-165:                                                                   
                    Although the taxpayer [a certified member of the                  
               Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians and Chief of                  
               the Grand Council of Confederated Nations] has cited                   
               more than thirty treaties, he has failed to point to                   
               any provision in any of the treaties which exempts his                 
               wages from federal income taxation because he is an                    
               Indian.  The Tax Court was also unable to find any                     
               exempting provision.  As the taxpayer has failed to                    
               demonstrate his right to an exemption, the decision of                 
               the Tax Court is affirmed.                                             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011