Kerry L. Brignac - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
          dependents; (2) whether petitioner is entitled to head of                   
          household filing status; and (3) whether petitioner is entitled             
          to claim his sons as qualifying children for the earned income              
          credit (EIC).                                                               
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by this reference.  Petitioner resided in New           
          Orleans, Louisiana, when the petition in this case was filed.               
               On his 1995 and 1996 Federal income tax returns, petitioner            
          claimed dependency exemptions for his sons, head of household               
          filing status (listing his sons as qualifying persons), and an              
          EIC (listing his sons as qualifying children).  Petitioner                  
          reported adjusted gross income (AGI) in the amounts of $12,214              
          and $6,995 on his 1995 and 1996 Federal income tax returns,                 
          respectively.                                                               
               Petitioner has never been married.  During the years in                
          issue he did not reside with his sons' mother, Twyanna Baker (Ms.           
          Baker).  Petitioner claims that for the years in issue he and Ms.           
          Baker shared custody and financial responsibility for his sons              
          and that his sons resided with him for part of the year and with            
          Ms. Baker for part of the year.                                             
          1.  Personal Exemptions                                                     
               Petitioner claimed dependency exemptions for his sons on his           
          1995 and 1996 Federal income tax returns.  Respondent has                   
          determined that petitioner is not entitled to dependency                    
          exemptions for his sons because petitioner has not substantiated            



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011