Steven P. and Maureen Cade - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          finding in 7 above.  The jury’s $1 million finding stemmed from             
          its finding in 8 above.  The jury made no finding of damages with           
          respect to its findings in 9 and 10 above.                                  
               On July 6, 1993, petitioner and Harris filed with the                  
          superior court a stipulation in which they agreed that petitioner           
          would receive $665,000 of punitive damages, for a total award of            
          $4.5 million.  Petitioner and Harris agreed in the stipulation              
          that Harris would pay petitioner the $4.5 million to settle all             
          of his claims related to the lawsuit and that CGC and the Heller            
          Group would remain fully liable to Harris for all payments made             
          by Harris.  The stipulation contained numerous provisions                   
          designed to protect Harris’ right to proceed against CGC and the            
          Heller Group to recover amounts that Harris paid on their                   
          behalf.1  Harris agreed to fund the settlement by itself on                 
          account of its banking relationship with and as an accommodation            
          to CGC and the Heller Group.                                                
               Harris paid petitioner $1,125,000 of the settlement proceeds           
          on July 7, 1993, and it paid him the balance approximately 5                
          months later.  On his 1993 Federal income tax return, petitioner            


               1 Among other things, petitioner promised that he would work           
          with Harris in its collection and enforcement efforts against the           
          other defendants.  Petitioner and Harris also agreed that the               
          superior court should retain jurisdiction of their case to enter            
          judgment in Harris’ favor as to the other defendants.  The court            
          agreed to retain jurisdiction and set the matter for status on              
          Dec. 15, 1993.  The record does not disclose what, if anything,             
          happened at that status hearing, or if, in fact, the status                 
          hearing was ever held.                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011