Estate of Theodore J. Chamberlain - Page 17




                                       - 17 -                                         

          of the first spouse to die.  This causes the taxable estate of              
          the surviving spouse to be larger than it would have been if an             
          amount equal to the unified credit in the estate of the first               
          spouse to die had passed directly to the object or objects of               
          their joint bounty.                                                         
               The technique for using the unified credit in the estate of            
          the first spouse to die that Meyer & Wyse discussed with decedent           
          and Mrs. Chamberlain was to have the surviving spouse disclaim              
          all or part of his or her interest in the estate of the first to            
          die.  Using this technique would ensure that the unified credit             
          would be fully used in the estates of both spouses.  By                     
          bequeathing the residuary estate to the surviving spouse and                
          providing for the disposition of any property disclaimed, the               
          wills enabled the surviving spouse, with the benefit of current             
          asset valuations, to evaluate his or her financial needs and                
          decide whether to disclaim, and if so, how much to disclaim, so             
          as to use the unified credit to the extent consistent with his or           
          her evaluation of his or her own needs.  See Manning et al. on              
          Estate Planning, 2-63 through 2-64 (5th ed. 1998).                          
               Petitioner contends that decedent disclaimed his interests             
          in the probate property of Mrs. Chamberlain by substantially                
          complying with section 2518 and Oregon law and should be treated            
          as having never received the disclaimed interests for Federal               
          estate tax purposes.  Respondent contends that decedent did not             





Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011